Good Laboratory Practice – GLP

Good Laboratory Practice in pharmaceuticals | What is Good Laboratory Practice | Why Good Laboratory Practice | The purpose of GLP |

  • Scope of this post
    • GLP from a Regulatory perspective
    • GLP from a Quality System perspective
  • What is Good Laboratory Practice ?
    • GLP is NOT just some good practices in a Laboratory
    • GLP is a Quality System concerned with the organizational process and the conditions under which laboratory studies are
      • Planned, Performed and Monitored
      • Recorded, Reported and Archived
    • Thus GLP covers the whole gamut of Laboratory Processes
  • Why Good Laboratory Practice ?
    • The purpose of GLP is to
      • Ensure quality test data
      • Ensure sound laboratory management
      • Ensure robust conductance of laboratory testing
      • Ensure accurate reporting of test findings
      • Ensure safe archival of laboratory data
  • Laboratory Data Integrity
  • Data integrity is very critical ‐ Analytical results should
    • Accurately describe the properties of the samples assessed
    • Permit correct conclusions to be drawn about the quality of the samples
    • Form the basis for any subsequent administrative and legal actions
    • Form the basis for any customer responses
  • Laboratory Data Global Acceptance
  • Laboratory data integrity has an important international dimension
    • Global acceptance of C of A
    • Duplicative testing can be avoided
    • Costs saved to nation and industry
    • Faster disposal of registration submissions

GLP Compliance Perspective

Good Laboratory Practice Compliance requirements:

  • The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
  • Schedule L‐1 on GLP effective Nov 2010
  • Schedule M ‐ Section 14 on Quality Assurance and Section 16 on Quality Control mentions about GLP
  • Schedule U Part III – Particulars to be recorded in Analytical Records pertains to GLP
  • 21 CFR Part 211, US FDA cGMP
    • Subpart I, Laboratory Control – stipulates detailed laboratory controls to be followed
  • EU GMP EudraLex Volume 4 Part 1,updated version effective Oct 2014
    • Chapter 6 – Quality control
    • Mentions Good QC Laboratory Practice stipulates detailed control measures
  • Recent Guideline from MHRA on Data Integrity essentially deals with GLP
  • WHO GMP Guidelines
    • TRS 957 Annex 1 – WHO Good Practices for Pharmaceutical QC Laboratories
    • TRS 961 Annex 2 – WHO Good Practices for Pharmaceutical Microbiology Laboratories
  • Other statutes and Guidelines like ICH Q7
  • Compliance is essential
    • For patient safety primarily
    • Meeting regulatory expectations
    • For high level of customer confidence
    • In dealing with any future litigations

GLP Quality System Perspective

  • Organization
    • Management responsibility
      • Defining Laboratory manager’s role and responsibilities
      • Independence of laboratory function (QC&QA)
      • GLP compliance must be referred to in the Quality Manual
      • Making resources available
      • Controls on external testing labs if any
      • Use of metrics related to laboratory operations
  • Laboratory Facilities
    • A factor that is overlooked in many organizations
    • Effective and accurate laboratory activities possible only if adequate space is provided
    • Adequate space includes – sample receiving and storage areas, testing areas, chemical storage areas, glassware washing areas, office areas, retention sample storage areas, document storage areas, training room etc.
    • Logical workflow to avoid crisscross movements
    • Crisscross movements kills productive man‐ hours in the laboratory
    • Consider space requirements 10 years ahead and make provisions
    • Apply principles of Lean Lab
  • Personnel and training
    • People make or break the GLP systems
    • Responsibilities should be defined, communicated and documented to avoid overlapping
    • Mere training is not enough
    • Talent identification and development plans
    • Personnel – How crucial they are ?
      • Good facility + Good systems + Right people = Good product
      • Average facility + Good systems + Right people = Good product
      • Average facility + Average systems + Right people = Good product (still possible)
      • Good facility + Good systems + Not the right people = Poor product
  • Laboratory Equipment
    • Automation is the answer for many of the laboratory illness
    • Ideally all needed equipment should be available
    • Outsourcing any tests only if justified
    • Equipment qualification, maintenance
    • Controls on computerized systems in line with 21CFR Part 11 and EU GMP Annex 11
    • Avoid data integrity breaches involving computerized systems in the laboratory by having robust controls
  • Chemicals and reagents
    • Chemicals, reagents and reference substances pay a vital role in the correctness of laboratory results
    • Microbiological cultures and media
    • Traceability in all records
    • Uncontrolled cost cutting in this area could lead to increased number of laboratory deviations and OOS results
  • Sampling and Testing
    • Sampling is a critical activity
    • Sampling should be done by trained personnel
    • Sample identification, samples controls and sample disposition should be as per written procedures
    • Sampling of stability samples as per written procedures for stability testing
    • Pharmacopoeial test procedures should be verified
    • Other test procedures should be validated
    • Concurrent recording of test results
    • Trending of test results
    • Stability testing as per written procedures
  • Laboratory Documentation
    • Documentation is key to the laboratory process
    • Laboratory documentation – Manual system, electronic system or a hybrid system
    • Robust controls for original raw data and traceability
    • Secured storage of documents
    • Equipment qualification documents
    • Method validation documents
    • Method transfer documents from R&D
    • Method transfer documents from other labs
    • Test reports and Certificates of Analysis
  • Out of Specification Investigations
    • Management of OOS results need special mention
    • OOS and atypical results arise due to
      • Laboratory error
      • Operator error
      • Process related error (usually in mfg.)
      • Material related errors
      • Environment related factors
    • Robust investigations process
    • Identification of root cause
    • Trending of OOS results
    • CAPA process
  • Self Inspection
    • One of the strongest tools for continual improvement if done diligently
      • Cover all laboratory areas and systems
      • Issue report as soon as possible
      • Get CAPA commitments and put CAPA tracking system in place
      • Findings discussed in management review meetings
  • Good housekeeping & Laboratory Safety
    • Good Housekeeping and safety go hand in hand
    • Employee safety, personnel protective equipment
    • Laboratory garment regime and contamination control
    • Equipment and facility safety; fire hazards
  • Risk Assessment in Laboratory
    • Identifying risks in laboratory operations is business critical
    • Still this is an area seldom addressed by the industry
    • Lack of knowledge and / or lack of commitment
    • Many a problem could have been avoided if a robust Risk Assessment process was in place.